Megaleecher.Net

Making technology work for you...

Get Your Free Subscription By Email:

Have American Tech Companies lost their way?

The last couple of weeks have seen amazing announcements by giant American tech companies. However, all the announcements were linked by how horribly they were handled by the respective corporate leaderships.

First, Hewlett-Packard, in one earnings call, 18 August, 2011, not only killed all production on webOS-based hardware, the Veer, the TouchPad and Pre 3, but effectively killed the future of the webOS operating system. However, this was collateral damage compared to what HP CEO Leo Apotheker did to the Personal Systems Group (PSG), the part of the company that actually makes laptops, desktops, monitors and printers. Mr. Apotheker announced that:
“We see the opportunity for PSG to compete and win in the PC marketplace and our Board has authorized to us explore strategic alternatives for PSG. We intend to evaluate a range of options that may include, among others, a separation of PSG from HP to a spinoff or other transaction.”

In plain language, Apotheker said “We want to get out of the manufacturing business because we think we are not making enough money. Will someone please buy this part of the company?” Not only did the value of the stock of HP drop twenty percent the next day, over time it became clear that no one wanted to buy the PSG and existing customers put purchases on hold and considered making equipment purchases elsewhere than HP.

Second, America Online (AOL), who owns many tech blogging sites such as Engadget, purchased the tech blogging site TechCrunch from its founder Michael Arrington about this time last year for a reported $30 million US. A few months later, AOL purchased the Huffington Post and the services of its founder Arianna Huffington as the head of a AOL Media Group, to whom Mike Arrington would be reporting as editor in chief of TechCrunch. Fast forward to last Thursday where Mike Arrington announces his formation of a new venture capital firm, CrunchFund. AOL announced it was investing $10 million USD in the venture. Additionally, Mike Arrington would continue at TechCrunch. Normally American journalists are not allowed to report on companies that they may have a financial interest in, so this arrangement resulted in a great deal of criticism.

Any ethical criticism of Mr. Arrington’s continued role at TechCrunch was immediately overshadowed by the reaction of Arianna Huffington, who was apparently never informed or consulted about the new venture of Mr. Arrington, and who stated that Mr. Arrington was finished at TechCrunch and no longer worked for AOL Media. Later, an AOL spokesman confirmed that Arrington no longer worked for AOL at all. Both of these statements contradicted statements that AOL’s CEO, made to the media less than 24 hours before. Finally, it was stated that Mr. Arrington did still work for AOL in something called AOL Ventures. The confusion is still ongoing as evidenced by posts by both a TechCrunch reporter and Mr. Arrington himself. The story is ongoing and it still is not clear what is going on.

Most recently, Carol Bartz was fired as CEO of troubled American search engine company Yahoo. The firing itself was not that unusual: the fact that it was done over the phone was. We know that Ms. Bartz was fired over the phone because she let the entire company know it through an all hands e-mail to Yahoo staffers that was “sent from her iPad”. Normally, a CEO of a major corporation is told face to face that their services are no longer required and usually given time to get the office cleaned out before the change is announced. If a CEO is fired as was Ms. Bartz, then it usually means police officers are waiting to carry them off. This is not the case here, as reports are surfacing that the firing snub will be cushioned by a $10.4 million USD severance package. It’s now being reported that Yahoo’s Chairman of the Board, Roy Bostock, was in the air traveling to the western US and Ms. Bartz was likewise traveling east at the time of the firing. Once the decision to sack Ms. Bartz was made, it was thought best to get the news to her as soon as possible. That excuse does not wash because the movements of CEOs of major corporations are mapped out well in advance, and the chairman of the board is certainly privy to that information. If a large corporation is taking a decision to let the head of the company go, then prudent thinking would require knowing where the head that you are putting on the chopping block is going to be.

Is this a pattern of corporate miss-steps, or just odd happenstance? Only time will tell.

Comments

Wow, I have over heard that HP will be making electronics but not for mass instead no they will be making it for corperation and white colar 9 to 5. Since they have bought out Compaq some years back it would only make sence to leave the HP brand to business and use there compaq band line to average joe and or students alike.

But to go as far now as to say "No we wasted money on technology lets do something else" is like well its simply like buying a roll royce and then selling it and using the money to buy a used honda instead.

If you follow the chronology of HP and Palm you will see they sold it before then recently bought it back. This is them putting their Prodical Son to Death. Their Prodgy was not doing as good as they would have liked it to with large sums of money. There were issues with WebOS and perception. It was NOT Marketed Well, the Campaigns were Milk Toast. No hard hitting in your face marketing that would have cost gazillions of dollars to show that WebOS is technically the Best OS on the Best Hardware (CPU ARM 11). I was a fan at one time, then made a mistake and went to Nokia, learned from that and moved over the Samsung and a Google Phone. Since now a Rooted Nook Color and have been happy ever since. I used Palm from Pilot to Treo 650 and 755. But this latest insanity by HP is REPREHENSIBLE. Fire Sale then announce another Fire Sale following it? WTFO? Oh we are putting it to bed but, OH MY, What Quick Sales we had. Boy we did have market penitration. OMG. Lets have another run.... We can get rid of the parts and make very little more. This company has COMPLETELY and UTTERLY Lost its way and the Current Leadership needs REMOVED with PREJUDICE.

This decission has me foregoing any purchases with HP as a whole. When my 6310 dies, it dies. I am looking at Casio or Cannon or anything that is NOT HP. I have heard this from other corporations too. Buy Lexmark Stock folks, HP is in a Death Spiral and no one is at the controls that has a clue how to fly.

Give me a break and announcing that PC's and laptops were going away too someone buy them..... HFC....

The Board Room has completely Lost their Mind.

Add new comment

This is just one of the many helpful tips we have posted, You can find more stories here,
Do subscribe to updates using your favorite RSS feed reader or using the secure FeedBurner email update form on top of this post.